systematic_reviews

 
Text Version
 
Site Map
Printer Friendly Version
   
 
 

CPRN Systematic Review Central Line Dressings


Table 11 Summary of studies where dressing change frequency is not identified@
Author Study
type
Study alloc Mean duration Study size Dress
type
Dress change Analysis
method
Insert site
culture
Blood culture Catheter tip culture Local inflam CRS CRI Other
T-Aurand
1997
comp Med
Rec
6.5 3931 T
TgG
HPT
NI
NI
NI
chi2
Odds ratio
CI
- - HPT <TG
p <0.001
T < TG p<0.008
T <s HPT
p<0.01
- - No HPT < HPT
P <0.001
cost saving
from CRI
HPTD <
no HPT
Taylor
1996
eval All 30 104 TgTl NI Wilcoxon
matched
no sign diff - - - 0.30% - 1 to 2nd dress
p = 0.001
1 to final dress
p = 0.2119
Moro
1994
cohort R 8.5 -
12.8
607 T
G
NI
2 - 3days
Pearson
Odds ratio
CI 95%

56.5
10.8-296
- - - - p< 0.0017
G < T
 
Andersen
1986
comp R 3.00
3.10
145 OP
NOB
prn
prn
chi2 Yates
Wilcoxon
p < 0.01
OP < NOB
- p <0.01
OP < NOB
p <0.01
OP < NOB
no sign diff -  
Return to CPRN Systematic Review Central Line Dressings

Last Updated on 28/06/1999
By Roy Sneddon

Last revised: 01 Jan 1970   URL:http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/cvl/clvtbl11.php
Copyright ©  The Joanna Briggs Institute 2006