systematic_reviews

 
Text Version
 
Site Map
Printer Friendly Version
   
 
 

CPRN Systematic Review
Central Line Dressings


Table 3: Summary of all studies
Author Study type Study alloc Mean duration Study size Dress
type
Dress change Analysis method Insert site culture Blood culture Catheter tip culture Local inflam CRS CRI Other
Reynolds 1997 comp R 5.6 100 OP3000
Tg
2nd dail unpair
t test
no sign diff - no sign diff - - - critical ICU
patients
T-Aurand 1997 comp Med
Rec
6.5 3931 T
TgG
HPT
NI
NI
NI
chi2
Odds ratio
CI
- - HPT <TG
p <0.001
T < TG p<0.008
T <s HPT
p<0.01
- - No HPT < HPT
P <0.001
cost saving from
CRI
HPTD < no HPT
Brandt 1996 exp R 22.3
21.7
101 OP 3000
G
OD
OW
z score 1
tail
K\Meier
MWhitney
no sign diff no sign diff no sign diff - no sign diff - cost comp
OP3000<G
Taylor 1996 eval All 30 104 TgTl NI Wilcoxon matched no sign diff - - - 0.30% - 1 to 2nd dress
p = 0.001
1 to final dress
p = 0.2119
Engervall 1995 eval R 39.5
46.0
32 Tg OW
TW
Fishers
Log Rank
K\Meier
p <0.07
TW < OW
- TW < OW
p <0.05
- p <0.08\TW <\OW no sign extra dress
TW<OAW
p <0.08
Moro 1994 cohort All 8.5 -12.8 607 T
G
NI
2 - 3days
Pearson
Odds ratio
CI 95%
56.5
10.8-296
- - - - p< 0.0017
G < T
 
Maki 1993 comp R 5.16 176 GA
GC2%
GB
2nd dail
2nd dail
2nd dail
Odds ratio
CI 95%
- - - - no sign diff GC2% com GB OR 0.26
CI 0.07 - 0.91
p <0.02
 
Freiberger 1992 quasi experimental R NI 60 TgC
TgB
GB
GC4%
M W F
M W F
M W F
M W F
chi2
analysis of variance
- - - more often in TgB and GB - - boys CL site infected more often than girlsp <0.044
Conly 1989 comp R 13.5
17.9
79 OP
G
2nd dail
2nd dail
chi2 t test
Fishers
MWhitney
p <0.01
G < T
- - - p <0.015
G < T
p <0.002
G < T
20 variables to predict
CRS
CRI
Young 1988 comp 5 where nursed NI 168 OPICU
OP
OP
G
TW
OW
O 10 dys
3W
chi2
Yates
T test
- no sign diff - no sign diff no sign diff   ICU pts OP ward G
gp diff
P <0.0005
Lawson 1986 comp R NI 365 TgG
G
OW
3 x a wk
T test
chi2
Fishers
- - - no sign diff - no sign - gps sign different diagnosis
Andersen 1986 comp R 3.00
3.10
145 OP
NOB
prn
prn
chi2 Yates
Wilcoxon
p < 0.01
OP < NOB
- p <0.01
OP < NOB
p <0.01
OP < NOB
no sign diff -  
Powell 1985 comp R NI 435 OP
OPB
OPB
GB
OW
OW
M W F
M W F
Fisher - - - - no sign diff no sign diff  
Prager 1984 comp R NI 162 G
GB
OD
OD
chi2
pair t test
- - - - no sign diff no sign diff site/sub<jug
p<0.025
duration 1-7 days
< 8-30 days <0.005
Nehme 1984 comp R NI 187 OP
GB
OW
TW
chi2 - * * - * 0.34%
0.63%
cost comp
OP<GB
p <0.89
Palidar 1982 comp All 17.8 32 OP
G
OW
TW
Percent - - - - - 1.00%
0.60%
cost mp
OP<G
Powell 1982 comp R 24.0\22.0 261 OP
GB
OW
3W
chi2 - - - - no sign diff no sign  
Shivnan 1991 experimental R NI 98 Tg
G
4th day
OD
chi2
tt estFisher
no sign diff no sign diff - - nil - cost comp
Tg<G
Vazquez 1984 eval Cons NI 100 TB 7 - 10 days percent 7.60% - - - - 1.00% 12 died
cath not cultured
Wheeler 1986 comp NI 14.5\16.4 63 T
G
OW
3 per wk
percent - - - - - T - 0%
G- 4.25%
cost comp
similar
Willie 1993 clinical trial R NI 101 OP
OP3000
OW MHaensl
no diff
- - - - 3.79%
1.35%
-  

Return to CPRN Systematic Review - Central Line Dressings



Last Updated on 25/06/1999
By Roy Sneddon

Last revised: 01 Jan 1970   URL:http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/cvl/clvtbl3.php
Copyright ©  The Joanna Briggs Institute 2006