systematic_reviews

 
Text Version
 
Site Map
Printer Friendly Version
   
 
 

CPRN Systematic Review Central Line Dressing


Table 7 Summary of transparent dressings and transparent and other dressings
Author Study
type
Study alloc Mean duration Study size Dress
type
Dress change Analysis method Insert site culture Blood culture Catheter
tip culture
Local inflam CRS CRI Other
Engervall
1995
eval R 39.5
46.0
32 Tg OW
TW
Fishers
Log Rank
K\Meier
p <0.07
TW < OW
- TW < OW
p <0.05
-
p <0.08
TW <
OW
no sign diff extra dressings
TW < OAW
p <0.08
Taylor
1996
eval All 30 104 TgTl NI Wilcoxon
matched
no sign diff - - - 0.30% - 1 to 2nd dress
p = 0.001
1 to last d ress p = .2119
T-Aurand
1997
comp Med
Rec
6.5 3931 T
TgG
HPT
NI
NI
NI
chi2
Odds ratio
CI
- - HPT <TG
p <0.001
T < TG p<0.008
T <s HPT
p<0.01
- - No HPT < HPT
P<0.001
cost saving
from CRI
HPT < no HPT
Vazquez
1984
eval Cons NI 100 TB 7 - 10 days percent 7.60% - - - - 1.00% 12 died cath
not cultured
Willie
1993
clinical trial R NI 101 OP
OP3000
OW MHaensl
no diff
- - - - 3.79%
1.35%
- study supp by manufacturers
Reynolds
1997
comp R 5.6 100 OP3000
Tg
2nd dail unpair
t test
no sign diff - no sign diff - - - critical ICU
patients
Return to CPRN Systematic Review Central Line Dressings

Last Updated on 28/06/1999
By Roy Sneddon

Last revised: 01 Jan 1970   URL:http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/cvl/clvtbl7.php
Copyright ©  The Joanna Briggs Institute 2006