systematic_reviews

 
Text Version
 
Site Map
Printer Friendly Version
   
 
 

CPRN Systematic Review Central Line Dressings


Table9 Summary of studies with any significant results
Author Study
type
Study alloc Mean duration
Study size Dress
type
Dress change Analysis method Insert site
culture
Blood culture Catheter tip culture Local inflam CRS CRI Other
T-Aurand
1997
comp Med
Rec
6.5 3931 T
TgG
HPT
NI
NI
NI
chi2
Odds ratio
CI
- - HPT <TG
p <0.001
T < TG p<0.008
T <s HPT
p<0.01
- - No HPT < HPT
P <0.001
cost saving from CRI
HPTD < no HPT
Engervall
1995
eval R 39.5
46.0
32 Tg OW
TW
Fishers
Log Rank
K\Meier
p <0.07
TW < OW
- TW < OW
p <0.05
- p <0.08
TW <
OW
no sign diff extra dressings
TW < OAW
p <0.08
Moro
1994
cohort R 8.5 -
12.8
607 T
G
NI
2 - 3days
Pearson
Odds ratio
CI 95%
56.5
10.8-296
- - - - p< 0.0017
G < T
 
Maki
1993
comp R 5.16 176 GA
GC2%
GB
2nd dail
2nd dail
2nd dail
Odds ratio
CI 95%
- - - - no sign diff GC2% com GB OR 0.26
CI 0.07 - 0.91
p <0.02
 
Conly
1989
comp R 13.5
17.9
79 OP
9G
2nd dail
2nd dail
chi2 t test
Fishers
MWhitney
p <0.01
G < T
- - - p <0.015
G < T
p <0.002
G < T
20 variables to predict CRS\CRI
Andersen
1986
comp R 3.00
3.10
145 OP
NOB
prn
prn
chi2 Yates
Wilcoxon
p < 0.01
OP < NOB
- p <0.01
OP < NOB
p < 0.01 no sign diff -  
Return to CPRN Systematic Review Central Line Dressings

Last Updated on 28/06/1999
By Roy Sneddon

Last revised: 01 Jan 1970   URL:http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/cvl/clvtbl9.php
Copyright ©  The Joanna Briggs Institute 2006